Photo
3 years ago
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
My Blog List
-
-
-
come here often?13 years ago
-
Photo11 years ago
-
-
6976 to 69804 days ago
-
Photo10 years ago
-
Technical Updates7 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
More foxing than f…ing1 year ago
-
bluelady329:5 years ago
5 comments:
Your captions are great, and I enjoy them. But sometimes the women you choose are so "shocking" that I lose all arousal...unless that is your point? To shrink the viewers organs to a point where any chastity cage would fit?
I know my opinion doesn't really matter, but this time I felt that you went a little overboard with the "BBW" thing. I can only hope that your future captions will include more of the anatomically correct females.
subjames78,
Different strokes for different folks! If we all liked the same thing, there wouldn't be enough to go round.
Your opinion is your own, and it matters. I would take honesty over anything else, every time. The essence of free speech is: "I may not agree with you, but I would defend your right to say it." I hope you afford me the same courtesy?
Thank you for taking the time to comment.
ptathuk
Anatomically correct?
Let me check.
Boobs in the normal spot.
Ass over her legs.
Joints and digits in the regular number.
Nose above her mouth.
I fail to see the problem here.
Oh, wait - she's a bit bigger than the kewpie dolls you normally see on teh intertubez.
Learn to enjoy the infinite variety of shapes and sizes in nature, my friend. And if thine eye offends thee, then click over to another page.
Sheesh.
Tom,
Hurah!
ptathuk
I love the tone of this sweet lady's comments. She knows what she wants and her slave is going to provide it.
Post a Comment